Το συγκεκριμένο άρθρο
είναι αποκαλυπτικό για την τακτική που ακολουθεί ο κ. Τσίπρας, όχι μόνο εντός
Ελλάδας αλλά και εκτός συνόρων. Τονίζει τη διγλωσσία και την ανευθυνότητα του
προέδρου του ΣΥΡΙΖΑ, τις «ετοιμοθάνατες» ιδέες του για την έξοδο της Ελλάδας
από την κρίση, που οδηγούν τη χώρα σε μια χαμένη ευκαιρία.
Ακολουθεί το άρθρο της
εφημερίδας:
Alexis Tsipras leads Syriza's struggle against 'globalized large capital.'
Alexis Tsipras, the leader of Greece 's Syriza party-the Alliance
of the Radical Left-is currently visiting the United States . It will be an
interesting experience for both sides.
Syriza is a political party committed to
overthrowing capitalism. It says so in its most recent policy document, a
declaration approved last month by a congress of 3,000 party delegates. This
declaration invites the Greek people to fight against an immensely powerful
enemy, "globalized large capital," which supposedly drives peoples to
total destitution both in Europe and the
developing world. "Capital" is also seeking to destroy the welfare
state, drag labor rights back to the 19th century, bring wages to third-world
levels and maximize unemployment.
But why are the peoples of Europe
not resisting the appalling march of capital? They would be, except parliamentary
institutions are a sham, not real democracy, per Syriza's declaration. So the
party is promising a "radical transformation of society" toward
socialism. It clearly and unequivocally rejects any attempt at improving
capitalism with what it calls "cosmetic changes."
Syriza vows that its view of socialism is not
"the replication of other models, which sought to rely on the same ideas,
but misinterpreted them, failed to remain faithful to them and finally, for
many complex reasons, self-destructed." Syriza hopes to succeed where
other socialist experiments failed. The declaration says that "we ought .
. . to learn as much as we can and as fully as we can from this great venture
and this great historical experience, with its novel achievements and its transforming
failures."
This account of mass murder and mass
imprisonment as a "great venture" or a "great historical
experience" is shocking, but it shouldn't be. Mr. Tsipras joined the
hard-line Greek Communist party in 1989, as the rest of the world was discovering
the secrets of the East German police. Mr. Tsipras moved to Syriza a few years
later. He is surrounded by like-minded stalwarts.
Associated Press
Alexis
Tsipras is greeted by supporters in Athens .
Syriza came from nowhere to win second place
in the Greek elections of May and June 2012. Its message of anti-establishment
resistance found sympathetic ears both at home and abroad. Alone among almost
all European politicians, Mr. Tsipras argued that Greece did not need another EU-IMF
bailout. He wanted Greece
to withdraw from the bailout program, reverse the austerity measures and
nationalize banks and large businesses. He also argued that Greece could
secure a bigger bailout if it threatened to destroy the euro
zone.
It was a hopeless plan. If German Chancellor Angela Merkel and other leaders had gone along with
Syriza's tactics, they would have invited other indebted states in the euro
zone to make similar demands, which ultimately the euro zone can not pay for.
Fortunately, last June, the Greek people voted to stay in the EU-IMF bailout
program, thereby averting a catastrophic default and Greek exit from the euro
zone.
But what explains the rise of this
once-marginal anti-capitalist alliance of Communists and former Communists?
Syriza's plan was indeed irresponsible, but was supported by an excellent
argument, which explains the party's popularity. Syriza correctly connected the
Greek crisis to the injustice and inept design of the world's financial system.
It is intolerable that ordinary Greek (or
Irish, or Portuguese, or Spanish) people should alone shoulder the burden of
all the errors committed by their own leaders, the managers of incompetent
commercial banks, the various regulators and the early designers of the euro.
The flaws in the design of the monetary union have vastly magnified the
consequences of Greece 's
own mistakes. So the plan to seek more help from the EU was not just a threat.
It was also an attempt to correct the injustice of saving the bosses and
punishing the taxpayers.
Unfortunately, Syriza is not pursuing this
line of thinking any longer, for implicit in such an argument was the
endorsement of a market economy. Syriza has now turned away from offering a serious
analysis of the debt crisis or indeed contributing to a European debate. It is
committed instead to class war, socialist revolution and crushing
"capital." Its rise and current positions are a missed opportunity,
both for Greece
and the West.
For all his appearance of control, Mr.
Tsipras is a weak leader. He tells his audiences whatever they long to hear.
Abroad, he speaks in favor of Europe , but at
home he advocates ultra-nationalist protectionism. He promises to work with
business, while he condemns capitalism and the very idea of profit. He rails
against tax evasion but seeks to prevent audits of small businesses.
Recent polls show that Greece is not
turning to communism or to extreme nationalism. But a significant part of the
electorate is attracted by these moribund ideas, which shows how far some have
lost their way. Greek public debate is still choked by hatred and despair.
However insignificant it may be in the long run, Syriza's defense of
totalitarianism is another sign of the confusion and misery that the Greek
people are going through.
Mr. Eleftheriadis is a fellow in Law at
Mansfield College, Oxford .